Quote:
Originally Posted by Damian Rey
You need to understand that it's not about Lesnar. It's about how his character is presented and how the show is built to showcase him. Outside of the first return feud with Cena, where he fucking lost, he was a featured attraction with lame storylines. That's no longer the case. He's the fucking man, the crowds are absolute shit hot for him, and he's presented as a huge fucking deal.
|
And what I keep asking is how that would be any different if he did supposedly lose to the Undertaker? Surely that would make a "rematch" all the more exciting as we'd genuinely believe there's a possibility Taker would lose a second time.
And if you think losing to Taker would "harm" Lesnar's rep/character then really the guy isn't that popular at all.
Wrestlers always have to win and lose and Lesnar is no exception. 2012-2016 even sporadic appearances is still a long streak with few losses: Cena, Triple H and you could call WM 31 a "loss" of sorts but I don't. Having Taker inflict that defeat would be interesting from a storyline perspective.